Not since the 1994 trial of OJ Simpson or the 2002 trial of Robert Blake has the public been so captivated by means of a celebrity court docket case. The Johnny vs. Amber Heard Defamation Lawsuit paints a bizarre and unsettling picture of the toxic relationship that Amber Heard and Johnny Depp used to have.Secret recordings, vaping witnesses, and some fascinating alternatives by way of each Heard's and Depp's attorneys are only a few of the moments that raised eyebrows or presented a moment of comedian reduction in a case that involves so much violence, domestic abuse, and manipulation. These are a few of the most odd moments from the Johnny Depp trial, and so they might also be some of the most abnormal moments in celebrity criminal historical past.
10 Amber Heard's Attorney Has An Ironic Name
Depp accused Heard of not most effective mendacity about him abusing her, (*10*) in the relationship. Who did Miss Heard make a selection to shield her against allegations of domestic abuse? Well, one in every of her lawyer's names and the person who cross-examined Johnny has an unlucky name for one of these case. Heard hired a person named Ben Rottenborn to protect her. Rottenborn, yes that is his actual name. It's now not the man's fault that his title is so ironic, nor does it have anything to do with the evidence in the case, however did no one in Heard's PR workforce catch that one?
9 Amber Heard's Lawyers Can't Remember Which Doctor Is Which
Heard's different lawyer, Elaine Bredehoft, had some issue when questioning her knowledgeable witness. Both aspects have presented psychologists as knowledgeable witnesses. Depp's facet brought in Dr. Curry who identified Heard with Borderline Personality Disorder, whilst Heard brought in Dr. Hughes. Elaine Bredehoft kept calling Dr. Hughes by way of Dr. Curry's name all the way through her wondering, and Hughes politely, regardless that reasonably indignantly, stored correcting her. In Bredehoft's protection, each ladies are blonde, have an identical heights, and have the identical job, so it's an comprehensible mistake, however it is embarrassing that it came about in entrance of such a massive target audience and will now exist forever online as a meme.
8 The "Mega Pint" Of Wine
Ben Rottenborn wondered Depp about the time Depp was consuming closely and poured himself a "mega pint of wine." Depp and the complete court docket raised an eyebrow in confusion as a result of there's no such factor as a mega pint. A pint is Sixteen fluid ounces, or 473 milliliters. Mega, numerically talking, method 1,000,000. Therefore, a "mega pint" would have to be 473,000 liters. Not even Johnny Depp may just drink that much wine.
7 Amber Heard's "Accident"
Among the pile of allegations that Depp and Heard threw back and forth at each and every different, one irritating one was once that Heard defecated in Depp's bed as payback for one in every of their many arguments. The disgusting tale has earned Amber a cruel nickname from on-line Johnny Depp supporters, "Amber Turd."
6 The Vaping Witness
Many of the witness testimonies had been prerecorded depositions from 2021, most of which were about the 2015 incident between Heard and Depp and the Colombia Hotel Penthouse they used to share. The front table clerk from the resort, Alejandro Romero, recorded his deposition from his phone in his car, and as the wondering wrapped up, a frustrated Romero took a massive hit from his vape and began using to paintings. The second got fun out of Depp and Heard's lawyers even apologized to the judge for that deposition. The judge was once surprised and mentioned that it was once "one of the most bizarre depositions" she has ever seen.
5 The Fist Pump
During Amber Heard's 2d day of testimony, she brought up Depp's ex-girlfriend Kate Moss and a fight the pair allegedly had once they were dating. Depp's lawyer, Ben Chu, let his jaw drop when she mentioned Kate Moss and he gave his partner a bit of fist pump. The second is one in all the few instances that Chu confirmed little restraint during witness testimony.
4 The Dismissed Journalist
Near the starting of the trial, Heard's attorneys were given one among Depp's witnesses pushed aside because they instructed the pass judgement on she had been posting on social media about the trial. It used to be later came upon that this was no longer true as a result of the post in question was once over a year old, which means that the witness was dismissed on false grounds. Heard's attorneys got this knowledge from her good friend, journalist Eve Barlow. When it was found out that Barlow had lied to the pass judgement on by means of Heard's lawyers, and when it used to be discovered she was the use of her phone to post about the trial while in the court docket after the pass judgement on had banned telephones, Barlow was kicked out and banned from the court docket for the remainder of the trial.
3 The Makeup Controversy
Heard's attorneys declare that she used a Milani makeup package to hide the bruises that Depp left on her. The web exploded when the corporate identified that the make-up package in query was not released till after their divorce. This was a significant blow to Heard's case.
2 The "Jar Of Cocaine" Reference
Heard testified that Depp had relapsed onerous, used to be starting to use cocaine again, and that he was once doing it so much that he saved a jar of cocaine next to their mattress. Depp seemed confused when she introduced this up and the web was quick to meme about one in all Depp's most memorable film traces, i.e.. the scene in Pirates of The Caribbean 2 when Jack Sparrow dances around making a song "I GOT A JAR OF DIRT! I GOT A JAR OF DIRT!" Heard made some critical allegations about Johnny while on the stand, but this was once one in all the few moments when she made him snort.
1 The Wrong Time To Object
In what could be one of the most embarrassing criminal debacles, one in every of Heard's attorneys objected to his personal question whilst cross-examining a witness. The witness was once answering a query about the effect Heard's article had on Depp's profession and the legal professional objected in the middle of the answer. Little FYI for any new regulation scholars studying this, you can not object to a witness answering your own questions. That's not how any of this works.
ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7tbTErZ%2Bippeoe6S7zGiZorKqlr%2BmecyopJ6mpKh6p77OpmSjp5iju7p5w56nqWWRoq%2BmvoyhnJqqlGKxprLAppitoZ%2BjerW%2ByJqjaA%3D%3D